Poll/Opinion What is Best course of action in Iraq?

[mrbowler]

I've been saying for quite some time that we should go with the Redeploy option-I think this might give us the best outcome..it allows us to have a presence, but with less direct involvement. Hopefully this will force the Iraqi people to create change(stabilize) without having more chaos then it currently has..if chaos breaks out at least the U.S. will still have a presence, and can create enough influence in the region to make sure other disruptive parties remain out of the conflict.

[Dolorosa]

It looks to me like the President, etc. want to police the world and the American people are being deceived about this so-called war on terrorism.
It's all about the New World Order and going under the UN which is anti-God.

Remember Michael New - [Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now]

[I'lltakeit!]

Its so sad how bad its gotten in Iraq. I really hope things get better. Not sure what the best solution would be.

[mrbowler]

Originally Posted by Dolorosa

It looks to me like the President, etc. want to police the world and the American people are being deceived about this so-called war on terrorism.
It's all about the New World Order and going under the UN which is anti-God.

Remember Michael New - [Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now]

Bush can actually argue that the "war on terrorism" includes Iraq because Saddam is no longer in control of the various factions-individuals related to terrorist groups are within Iraq, but I believe according to various Generals this is like 5th on the list related to violence. Could you expand on your belief that this is all about New World Order, and going under the UN which is anti-god ??

[mrbowler]

Originally Posted by I'lltakeit!

Its so sad how bad its gotten in Iraq. I really hope things get better. Not sure what the best solution would be.

So you don't buy into the notion that the media is just reporting the negative news, and not the positivesi.e. liberal media bias, want the u.s. to lose).
Thought this was a good article to read:

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now]

"But even with a significantly smaller footprint, the U.S. would retain sufficient firepower on the ground and in the skies to guard against others trying to intervene. After a majority of U.S. troops depart, a military presence of some size will still be needed — not so much to referee a civil war, as U.S. forces are doing now, but to try to keep it from expanding"