Go Back   Deal and Coupon Forums, by DealofDay > General Discussion > General Chit-Chat

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2003, 12:37 PM
Shainie's Avatar
Ultimate Deal Wizard
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Minnesota
Age: 34
Posts: 4,100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Shainie can save money at the drop of a hatShainie can save money at the drop of a hatShainie can save money at the drop of a hatShainie can save money at the drop of a hatShainie can save money at the drop of a hatShainie can save money at the drop of a hat
Send a message via ICQ to Shainie
Rolling eyes A fine example of why you can't believe everything you read.

I'm sure many of us like to read newspapers or news magazines, and then discuss with others what we've read, taking the information for fact.

I like to read Newsweek while I eat lunch. One part I pay particular attention to is the "Editor's Note" or "Corrections". There have been some doozies! I don't remember the exact story, or the exact correction, but one time there was something like "We reported that Mr. X killed 2 people his 2 daughters stood trial. We regret our mistake in reporting, Mr. X was never convicted of Murder, and he has no daughters". I remember taking the article home to my DH because I couldn't believe how crazy it was!

Anyway - in the April 14 Newsweek is the following Editors' Note: In "Fanning the Flames: Cheney's Halliburton Ties", Newsweek implied that Vice President Dick Cheney may have used his influence to award government contracts to his former employer, Halliburton, and its subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root. Newsweek has no independent evidence to support this implication, and we regret making it. We also reported that Cheney "hasn't entirely severed his financial ties" to Halliburton. As a Cheney spokesperson noted in the item, the vice president receives deferred compensation but has no financial stake in the future of the company".

In the April 7 issue, here is the Correction: In "The Arrogant Empire", we said that Saddam gassed 60,000 of his own people in Halabjah in 1986. In fact, the gassing was in 1988, and killed 5,000 (though it wounded thousands more). NEWSWEEK regrets the error.

I wonder how many "discrepancies" get by without being pointed out? People read it, take it as fact, and then don't see the correction.

I guess that's why I learned to take everything with a grain of salt, and unless I've seen it with my own eyes, I won't truely take it as fact.


__________________

Check out these [Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now], or go directly to [Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now]
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now] EXP: 04.30.2003
Save 10% off of your purchase at Art.com with coupon code C207855315014.

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now]

[Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now]
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2003, 05:49 PM
3tbear's Avatar
Infinite Deal Wizard
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never lose hope, there's a rainbow just around the corner
Posts: 11,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
3tbear is welcome here
You really can't take things literally these days. To actually put in print that Saddam had that many people gassed, and then to retract the statement in error is just unbelievable.

I read the Wall Street Journal daily, and I've even seen retractions in that paper.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2003, 09:26 PM
pandybat's Avatar
Ultimate Deal Wizard
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,188
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
pandybat has great potential
And if only the retractions were as in as plain a sight or in as big a print as the original story......
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2003, 09:42 PM
AtlantaGAL's Avatar
Senior Deal Wizard
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Atlanta Metro
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
AtlantaGAL has great potential
Send a message via Yahoo to AtlantaGAL
Yeah, print publications tend to bury their retractions where probably half the readers never look.


__________________

Check out these [Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now], or go directly to [Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now]
[Only registered and activated users can see links. Either login above or Register Now] EXP: 04.30.2003
Use coupon code SEMESTER to save $15 off of your first purchase of $50 or more at Half.com.
Reply With Quote
 
Unread
DealofDay Coupons
 



Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 AM.


Copyright 2009 Socrates Digital, LLC.
All rights reserved world wide.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42