Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNdamental  Actually, the word "propaganda" was pretty much confirmed by Scott McClellan and attributed to the White House. |
"Actually", it doesn't matter much at all what McClellan has said or written because it doesn't have much credibility. It is consistent with the liberal blabbering that's gone on for so long. Yes, I know, DUH...you're going to say that the consistency is what gives it credibility, aren't you?
That is just one facet of the many flaws you liberals are "gifted" with. You believe that the more you can get other people to repeat your meme, the truer it becomes. Sorry, but gobs of lipstick on a pig doesn't make the pig look like Catherine Zeta-Jones. Convincing as many other people that you can to say that the pig looks just like her ignores the FACT that CZ-J is a looker and the pig is NOT.
So to say that what McClellan has said "rings true" because it fits with what so many other liberals say blatantly ignores the FACT that what liberals say does NOT have ANY substance!
Who knows what motivated McClellan to write his book, but he'll definitely get a lot more sales if he engineers it for fools ready to part with their money. The biggest fools have proven to be liberals, more than eager to drop their dough on a Mikey Mooron flick of "fictition" or to fund some bonehead's campaign...perhaps even Hillary's or Barack Obonehead's!
So if you're going to write a book, write it so that it will sell the most copies! You can't fault McClellan for wanting to get the best bang for his buck and for being a good capitalist!
His integrity is definitely in question, for if he truly HAD integrity and didn't believe what he was "paid to say" while he worked in the White House, he would have quit, wouldn't he?
As far as the substance of what he has to say (GWB was intent on going to war, etc.), again, all that is right in line with the common liberal mindset. We've seen over and over again where liberals cannot reason through their thought processes. If YOU had the capability of thinking and reasoning through your thought processes, DUH, perhaps you would be able to answer the many questions I posed (and reiterated in post #11 above). But you can't, can you??? Your belief system is flawed and the foundation it's built upon is flimsy.
Oh, by the way...congratulations on getting the "quote" function to work in post #12. Do it again and maybe I'll toss you a biscuit!